ARTICLE 3 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION
Article 3
Article 3: Parliament may by law—
- form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States or by uniting any territory to a part of any State;
- increase the area of any State;
- diminish the area of any State;
- alter the boundaries of any State;
- alter the name of any State;
Provided that no Bill for the purpose shall be introduced in either House of Parliament except on the recommendation of the President and unless, where the proposal affects the area, boundaries, or name of any of the States, the Bill has been referred by the President to the Legislature of that State for expressing its views within such period as may be specified.
Key Provisions Explained
Point No. | Provision / Clause | Explanation |
---|---|---|
1 | Formation of new States | Union can create new States by separating from an existing one or merging parts of two or more States. |
2 | Increase in area | Parliament can increase the area of any State by law. |
3 | Decrease in area | The area of any State can be reduced through a law. |
4 | Boundary alteration | It empowers Parliament to redraw State boundaries. |
5 | Name change | Names of States can be changed by law passed by Parliament. |
6 | Recommendation of the President | Bill for State reorganization can only be introduced with President’s recommendation. |
7 | Referral to State legislature | President must refer the Bill to the concerned State legislature for opinion. |
8 | Non-binding opinion | State’s view is not binding on Parliament. It's just advisory. |
9 | Not a constitutional amendment | Law under Article 3 is not considered a Constitutional Amendment. |
10 | Union's supremacy | Reflects centralization of power for maintaining unity & integrity. |
11 | Internal readjustments | Useful for administrative reorganization or resolving local disputes. |
12 | Use in past reorganizations | Used for creating States like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Telangana, etc. |
13 | No requirement of consent | Consent of State is not required for reorganization. |
14 | Part of federal compromise | Balances unitary and federal features under quasi-federal structure. |
15 | President's role crucial | President acts on Union Cabinet’s advice; ensures Union control. |
16 | Unique to Indian Constitution | Very few countries have such flexible territorial restructuring powers. |
Landmark Supreme Court Judgments
- Berubari Union Case (1960): Clarified that ceding Indian territory requires a constitutional amendment under Article 368 and not Article 3.
- Babulal Parate v. State of Bombay (1960): Court upheld that Parliament can reorganize States even without State consent.
- K.S. Bhalla v. State of M.P. (1995): Reiterated that Parliament is not bound by State Legislature's opinion.
- Pradeep Chaudhary v. Union of India (2008): Emphasized procedural importance of Presidential reference, even if advisory.
Note: These judgments collectively reinforced the supremacy of Parliament and flexible nature of India’s quasi-federal structure.
Article 2 vs Article 3 — Key Differences
Feature | Article 2 | Article 3 |
---|---|---|
Subject | Admission or establishment of new States from outside India | Reorganization of existing Indian States |
Consent of State | Not applicable | Not mandatory (only consultation needed) |
Example | Sikkim (before 1975) | Telangana (2014) |
Procedure | Simple legislation + Presidential recommendation | Legislation + State legislature consulted + Presidential recommendation |
🟢 Related Posts : To Read, Click on the Links
🔗 Article 3 – Fully Explained🔗 Article 2
🔗 Article 1
🔗 FAQ for IAS Aspirants – Strategy & Motivation
Article 3 and Indian Federalism
Though India is a federal polity, Article 3 showcases a centralizing tendency. The power to unilaterally reorganize States lies with the Union Parliament. It ensures:
- Territorial integrity and national unity
- Flexibility for administrative efficiency
- Peaceful resolution of regional demands (like Telangana, Bodoland, Gorkhaland)
Conclusion: Despite its centralizing nature, Article 3 is essential for India's dynamic governance structure. It reflects both federal aspirations and national cohesion.
Unique UPSC-Level Insights
- India is among the few nations where Parliament can alter State boundaries without a referendum.
- Article 3 is central to India’s linguistic reorganization post-1956.
- Enables peaceful decentralization by addressing sub-regional aspirations (e.g., Bundelkhand, Vidarbha).
- It is one of the pillars supporting cooperative federalism and regional balance.
Prelims Practice Questions (MCQs)
1. Which of the following is required before introducing a Bill under Article 3?
A. State consent
B. Judicial approval
C. President’s recommendation
D. Governor’s opinion
2. Article 3 deals with:
A. Admission of foreign territories
B. Reorganization of States
C. Emergency powers
D. Amendment of Constitution
3. The Berubari Case dealt with:
A. Fundamental Duties
B. Citizenship
C. Cession of Territory
D. President’s Ordinance
4. Which one of the following is true about Article 3?
A. It cannot alter boundaries
B. It can only be used after State approval
C. It needs Constitutional Amendment
D. It doesn’t need State consent
Practice Mains Questions (UPSC GS-II)
- Discuss the significance of Article 3 in maintaining the unity and integrity of India.
- “Article 3 reinforces the centralizing bias of the Indian Constitution.” Critically analyze.
- Compare and contrast Articles 2 and 3 with suitable examples and judicial interpretations.
- Explain how Article 3 supports cooperative federalism despite its unitary tilt.
- Examine the role of Parliament in State reorganization with reference to key judgments.
✍️ Closing Note for Aspirants
Understanding Article 3 is crucial not just for prelims and mains but also for grasping India’s federal journey. As an aspirant, always study constitutional provisions along with case laws, comparisons, and real-world events.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to share your thoughts. Keep it respectful.